panasonic gx9 review

Since it is a studio comparison of cameras then the same lens should be used when possible and since they both have the same mount then it would be no problem and should be used to maintain integrity of the comparison. Now, frustratingly, after updating to V. 1.3, the original problem of blurry pictures using Dual IS is back, with shutter speeds slower than 1/20th. My gx85 absolutely destroys my d750 in this regard - your random tests of face tracking in a dim environment are at best a distraction. My personal favorite on this camera is the Leica-branded 15mm F1.7, it's a bit wider, and focuses instantly - but is more expensive. New York, Question on the field sequential viewfinder (in case the photographer is sensitive to flickering monitors): Is rainbow tearing just bothering or does it limit the function to evaluate the results?How well is the EVF the GX9 suited to control- exposure, - manual focus,- flare,- pol-filter effects,- colour saturation, ... etc. Go to page: Performance … The GX9 should have all the features of the GX8 but the improved sensor, image stabilization, burst rate, UHD30 video recording and BT-LE. I will check out this feature for its effectiveness. ;P. For the money, the GX9 really should've had weather sealing IMO, specially if they were sticking with that crummy EVF. But I’ve knelt down plenty in it and remained comfortable getting the perfect angle thanks to the GX7/9. Companies in general are pretty bad at naming cameras, but Panasonic takes the cake. I guess I don't . Priced at $1000 with kit lens, the GX9 offers a 20MP sensor, 5-axis stabilization and promises a 90% reduction in shutter shock. The mechanical shutter on the E-M5 II also goes up to 1/8000 which might be useful to some. Don't these use the same mounts? One look through that thing and I sent it right back to B&H. It does everything else i want for travel and street. It's not a camera for sports, good AF-C is not needed. But yes you can set aperture and shutter speed and then use the EC dial to adjust exposure based on iso. Although it technically replaces the GX8, it seems more like a beefed-up GX85 rather than a direct successor the … Having now spent a good deal of time using it, I can also confidently say that the GX9 … Good question. I'll say this tho, the 12-60 being sealed is a better value add than the average kit lens, and all three of Pana's kit lenses are more attractive than any of Oly's low end kit lenses (abs Oly seemingly seems to be charging $200 extra for them lately rather than $100-150). My brother has the EM1 and he told me that the PDAF is only used with old 4/3 lenses. The GX9 is a versatile camera that will suit a wide range of uses and photographers. Being able to resize and drag the histogram anywhere on the screen is pretty nice for one. The difference being that the 5D series is already established at certain point in the market. View our sample gallery to see how a bit of shift can change a photo or introduce creative effects. I think Panasonic's naming nomenclature killed this camera. Marketing will have you want to believe that, but seeing an articulated screen is the kiss of death to me. I’m looking at other cameras too, such as the Canon M50 and it is unclear to me how well these cameras do in AF-S / AF-S in low light. I agree you. Had Pana put sealing on the GX9 I think the $1K price point would be better justified relative to the GX85/G85/etc. I love its minimalistic design. Sigma's new primes promise very good performance and light weight, when paired with L-mount and Sony E-mount mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras. Indeed, this is pretty close to the same and I remember people being similarly annoyed about it at the time. The recent firmware upgrade, from V. 1.1 to 1.2, seems to have rendered the GX9 IBIS almost unusable. Oly's menus are definitely confusing at first too, the labeling and organization just isn't great or as intuitive IMO but you do get used to it and it does offer a bit higher degree of customization. You confirmed what I already suspected. Bluebomber, GX9's high ISO is better. Haven't used the GF7 however since I got the GX9. The in-built stabilization helps a lot, especially if you pair it with a stabilized lens when you get Dual IS effect, which is 5-axis in the compact GX9. For whatever reason (low sales or competition with the G9-level model) they've decided that isn't the case, and have reverted to the previous strategy. The Lumix GX9 uses the same 20.3MP Micro Four Thirds sensor that was in the GX8, but Panasonic has removed the low-pass filter from the sensor in the newer camera. Receive news and offers from our other brands? I wonder if that has been resolved? It’s a great take everywhere unit with the 20 1.7. With the Lumix GX9, Panasonic has listened to its users and made a rangefinder-style mirrorless camera that many will see as a true successor to the … When we first reported on the alleged ransomware attack back in August, Canon said it was 'investigating the situation.' Panasonic's Depth-from-Defocus technology makes for speedy and accurate autofocus in a wide range of situations. Again, not trying to say it's the best tool for action photography. I look at the samples between this camera and the Olympus cameras and I notice just how much sharper the Panasonic. I don't doubt that the Sony models are better when there's good light and AF-C at high frame rates is required. Looks like an awesome all around camera that goes anywhere. With Panasonic GX9, you can record your videos at a highest resolution of 3840 x 2160 at 30p,24p fps and save in MPEG-4, AVCHD and H.264 formats. Panasonic's problem is. Definitively. What is happening in DPR? Is that an unseen advantage? However, the camera's video performance is hindered by overheating issues. I sold it... My canon Powershot G12 had better auto white balance than this one. I highly recommend it. Is the IBIS effective? The Pen F body originally launched at $1199 USD. Lens, DC-GX9MK (USA Black), PANASONIC LUMIX GX9 4K Mirrorless ILC Camera Body with 12-60mm F3.5-5.6 Power O.I.S. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Here are some of our favorites. Impossible to make any conclusion. Really disappointed by this review. It’s C-AF and C-AF+tracking are better than my GX9 as well as my A6300... as it should be given its cost! It would be my first m4/3 camera. Never had an issue with front focusing. Colours, detail and high ISO significantly improved over the GX85. Both articulated and flip up and down screens can of course be used like that if you prefer, stuck to the back of the camera. The GX9's redesigned shutter eliminates shutter shock, and the JPEG engine gets a big update in terms of color. The issue here isn't even the PEN-F, it's Pana's own lineup! thanksactually right now base on all recent development, i will have to reconsider whether spending more money on MFT is a good ideai mean Panasonic go full frame, Olympus no new camera..etc, i don't like Sony lens , if stay APS-C next camera will be Fuji. Panasonic cameras have world class S-AF in terms of speed and accuracy. The GX9 is well-built and compact but has room for a good amount of customizability and controls - plus, of course, that tilting viewfinder. The studio scene shouldn't be used to compare sharpness except for fixed lens cameras. The GX9 while similar to GX85 does seem to have a bit of a change in the body. And new in the Lumix GX9 is in-camera focus stacking, so you no longer need a computer to merge a series of images with different focus points into a single photo that’s sharp from front to back – something that's impossible to achieve in macro photography with a single exposure. It's disappointing, and it's about 6 months late. They simply want you to keep upgrading to the next camera. I do agree though the grip is the weakest part of the GX85. A lot of pictures are "gray" out of the camera JPEG. It is TIME for Panasonic to add a PDAF to its AF. I've been watching this happen for 10 years now. Might the results surprise you? For the GX9 I know the answer because I own the GX80, but for the Canon the focus is also too much on tracking. if i buy e-m5 ii , i will buy with 12-40 pro for about US$1000olympus lens may AF better with Olympus camera, i actually very likely will buy, wait until early next year what new camera Olympus will announce first, for how i look at pics, on 4k screen, i doubt 16MP and 20MP have much differencealso LX200 only 17MP, suddenly 16MP not so bad, good to low AF in low light OK as i plan to use the superior IS for really low light landscape. I'm specifically referring to the studio comparison too. The GX line is nothing if not inconsistent, always has been and will likely continue to be. @Jefftan I concur with @Raist3d and that you’re running the risk of disappointment with any camera if you’re banking on nailing detailed lowlight landscapes handheld. Pity they have used the same EVF. TicWatch Pro 3 LTE launched, improving on an already great smartwatch, How to get an Nvidia RTX 3080, 3070 or a 3090 even though they're all sold out, Where to buy PS5: restock tracker to find PS5 on sale during Cyber Week, Best digital photo frame 2020: 7 great home displays for your photos, Cyber Monday phone deals 2020: these offers are still available, Antivirus alone is no longer enough to keep your devices protected. I'll take the discreet flip screen, easily over the Pen, or none at all... Now if Panasonic was smart, they'd copy what Fujifilm has done with the X-T2's flip screen. @Richard, larkhon - I think the issue here is that people want something for nothing. It would be even better if either manufacturer included a bias setting for the 1/SS rule when shooting in A mode tho, seems like something that would go hand in hand with great IBIS so people can better leverage it without having to go full manual. For those times when the screen can’t cut it, enter the GX7/9’s 90 degree EVF. You people are crazy. Here's what he found. I’ve been into photography for 12 years, and out of all the cameras I’ve purchased the GX9 is my favorite. Size of the system with the lens. It didn't have a perfect C-AF keeper rate, though not many ca… Far better that the manufacturer forget about the retro look and build flush strap mounts into the body of the camera like many other camera manufacturers do. I thought the Japanese-market name for the GX85, the GX7 mk II, made more sense, and if they'd used that naming internationally and called the GX9 the GX7 mk III I suspect everyone would be happy even if the feature set isn't quite as consistent over the three as one might hope for. "Product development isn’t about virtuous engineers who create lovely things and evil marketing people who take them away. a child/stranger) can be affected as much by the (intimidation of the) person behind the camera looking at them as it can the size of the camera (as any documentary filmmaker will attest). There was a problem. Here, the camera uses its 4K video processing power to capture images designed to be exported as 8MP stills. For social situations and street shooting there is system that matches Panasonic - discreet, super accurate and lightning fast. I think the Japanese market naming scheme tells it all. NY 10036. This means that Panasonic GX9 provides 4K (Ultra … The Em1-II however just looks blurry and defocused. Also, the GX8 isn't dead. Aside for the dismal EVF its major problem is pricing. But the AF speed in the AF-C mode in photo and video and the distracting "hunting" in the viewfinder and video, as the burst rate, are disappointing.It adds IBIS, touch screen and 4K, and could be compared to the A6500, but the main advantage of the GX9 vs. the APS-C systems as SONY is the availability of compact and lower cost tele zoom lenses (1/2 crop factor). The image quality observed is quite nice, with the camera's new OLPF-less sensor capturing lots of fine detail, pleasing colors and good dynamic range for a Four Thirds chip. @Raist3dWhat I'm saying is, the G9 with its fully articulated screen isnt Stills focused in my opinion. The work done under warranty: [BIS not working well, order main and sensor. Because I like to own 2 camera's I am looking for a secendhand GX8. Yes, very true. I wouldn't care about mic jack, super fast AF or high fps, so I understand and I'm ok with a mid-level product - I actually own a GX9 - but I don't understand why they're holding back on such features (or maybe I do ;)). Handling is good, image quality is good enough for me, and having IBIS at this price point is an absolute bargain. & CAPACITOR A.P. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that might be a bit older but still offer a lot of bang for the buck. If both are mechanical, then the "digital IS" is a THIRD kind of image stabilization. I had GX8 too and was very pleased with that too, using mostly electronic shutter. The Canon R5 has many noteworthy features, not the least of which is 8K video recording. I was extremely pleased when I saw that for the latest GX camera, Panasonic had decided to use the smaller form factor. This is not correct. As the GX9 sees those two lines recombined, there are some nuances to its feature set that we'll cover thoroughly on the following pages of this review. lends its self much better for street shooting, also the GX80-9 are smaller bodies. Lots of stills cameras have an articulated screen. I have send it back too. I have also noticed that DPREVIEW has gone backwards in their quality of reviews. I would at least use the Olympus 45 1.2 to get some where close in price (even though it's still $200 less. Current page: Panasonic GX9 review sample Photos. For a reduced price ($750 or less) I think it's still worth it, specially if shooting action isn't a top priority. I do think Pana lapped Oly as far as the usability of eye detect, and they've long had the best implementation of touchpad AF while using the EVF (this isn't new, the G6 could already do that well). Lens variation make the DPReview studio test almost useless, especially for "pixel peeping". It's a niche (and pricey) product to be sure, but so far we find it to be well-designed and capable of outstanding results. It's the GX8 that was the anomaly, not this newer model.". Panasonic had: 1. in-boby stabilization, with no crop. But not the body syze, autonomy or cost.If Oly-Pana start using PDAF in new fast AF cameras, APS-C format could go away. It is not. Down to $999 at the moment. The GH5 and the G9 are both hybrid cameras, it's true, as are most cameras these days from any manufacturer. Check if you are ready to post-process all your pictures. Yes, it is true. Agreed, as a GX90 it would have seemed a nice step up but somehow calling it a GX9 just leaves a bad taste in the mouth. They stressed the usability of Touch AF, even if you're not a fan you shouldn't knock it unless you've tried it, genuinely useful to many... Pana's UI and touch interface has a lot of little touches I still appreciate over my more otherwise more customizable Oly body, but which you can still turn off entirely if you hate them. It's small, lightweight and does a lot of things well, including image quality, autofocus, and overall performance. However for various reasons my go to camera was a GF7 for its small size with the kit 12-32mm lens. Perfectly said. This benefit for candid portraiture of this simple but oh-so-effective feature set cannot be appropriately understood without witnessing it 1st hand. The design is handsome and understated, it comes with a 20 megapixel Four Thirds sensor and its standout feature is a tilting electronic viewfinder that is really handy, but not without its own caveats. PROOF READ at least, SHAME on you DPR! Tney used to be the leader in detailed reviews when they first started, so good that many camera users would print a hard copy to supplement their camera manual. The company has announced several new models over the past few months, including the GH5S and G9 at the higher … @ Richard. Getting close to as bad as a bare RX100. Not sure how to rate DR, as each camera gets wonky in its own special way: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=panasonic_dcgx9&attr144_1=panasonic_dcg9&attr144_2=panasonic_dmcgx85&attr144_3=sony_a6300&attr146_0=200_5&attr146_1=200_5&attr146_2=200_5&attr146_3=100_5&attr177_1=off&attr177_2=off&attr177_3=off&normalization=compare&widget=462&x=0.17387438274278788&y=0.4990622261174409, To be fair here, if we move over to one of the pictures of people, the GX9 does noticeably better than the GX85: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=lowlight&attr13_0=panasonic_dcgx9&attr13_1=panasonic_dcg9&attr13_2=panasonic_dmcgx85&attr13_3=sony_a6300&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=3200&attr16_2=3200&attr16_3=3200&attr171_0=1&attr171_1=1&attr171_2=1&attr171_3=1&normalization=compare&widget=625&x=-0.8914851018725709&y=0.22593568792830787 (I’m saying this as the owner of the GX85; the GX9 looks nicer, but not double-the-price nicer, and I prefer the GX85’s smaller kit lens). Wonder why Panasonic doesn't advertise this additional image stabilization capability. The 35mm F2 DG DN is the standard prime in the group of new Sigma I-series lenses. Shooting from the waist I felt like I was attracting more attention due to unfolding the 'wing'. They had the GH and the G series... Everything doesnt need a fully articulated screen and most Hybrid shooters prefer DSLR shaped bodies. GX8 doesn't have FS. It has a relatively compact, rectangular, rangefinder-style body, and … Panasonic has based the Lumix GX9 around a 20.3-megapixel Four Thirds sensor similar to that used in the GX8. This seem to be the trend in the recent FF SONY body/lens designs... Olympus, EM1 and EM1.2 both have on sensor PDAF and in the case of the latter, I prefer it’s AF to my A6300. The af on the penf for action is really bad. They can also basically see in the dark. Great improvement in 1080p video sharpness over the GX85, which makes it a tempting upgrade. Panasonic should stop listening to their own ambassadors, because they're killing the line for stills users. It is the camera that introduced the brand new 20MP sensor, Dual … The GX9 certainly appears to tick all the right boxes. The Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN is for the photographer who wants a focal length that falls squarely between 50mm and 85mm. Because the IS is still pretty good. If Nikon had released a D7x00 body but called it the D400 then this would be a more accurate example. But a review is fair if it mentions this issue but what is wrong is how much trolling goes on as a result and how the compact, sharp, very-clear high-resolution of the SF evf units is ignored. Doesn't that post style strap lug dig into the right hand? Sorry Rick, I dont see a camera with a Video friendly Swivel screen as a stills-first camera. The Lumix GX9 comes with 4K video, as we’d expect from Panasonic, and enhanced 4K Photo modes. Aug 18, 2018 Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 added to studio scene comparison. The lens variations make it difficult to even compare sensor performance for moire artifacts and whatnot, though I think dpreview tries to use the sharpest lenses available at the time for any given mount. Hi ChrisFB: I have the m100 and 22mm lens as well as a gx80. If both were priced at a grand I'd still say the GX9 is the better overall value for the average/new user, but AFAIK the E-M5 II has been priced down and weather sealing is a sticking point for some. AF-S autofocus performance in our lab testing proved very quick and was competitive with even prosumer-level DSLRs. He's in a way validating what you said with a joke. We really like the GX9, and find that it's a lovely camera to use. I can't believe that at this late stage of the game, DPR can get is so wrong when it comes to their reviews.In the comparison chart between the GX8 and GX9, it shows the GX8 (which I own and bought for it's 4K capability over the excellent GX7 which I have retained) it shows the GX8 as topping out at 1080/60p!Yet elsewhere it states ''4K is a big deal on the GX8. Aiming to save photographers carrying a cable and a charger for every battery they use, this device handles up to four batteries at the same time and can charge at home, in the car and via a USB power bank. The Panasonic GX9 takes the GX line back to a smaller body size and introduces a tiltable electronic viewfinder. The Lumix GX9 gets Bluetooth as well as Wi-Fi connectivity, with the former enabling a constant connection to your smartphone with minimum power consumption. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing under $1000 and recommended the best. I just bought a GX9 a short while ago, it's a very underrated camera in my opinion. I thought the overall review is good, but you do call out a key omission with the AF-S speed of these DFD Panasonics. Its 2018.Why aren't there Body-Only options? Are both of these mechanical IS? AF results shooting slow bicycle is really BAD and POOR, as does the low light focusing. It would be like Canon adding 4K video to the 6D2 and calling it a 5D MKV. Indoors, under normal incandescent lighting, color balance is warm with the default Auto white balance (AWB) setting, however when AWBc is selected, … So pour a tall cold one and get ready to treat yourself, 2020 style. Using the GX9 for almost half a year taking some thousand shots I can see one nameable issue (beside the WLAN bug on Win7 systems):The designated exposure dial can be switched on or off but it is NOT customizable.That´s a pity because I prefer the rear dial for exposure compensation BY FAR. I'm also pleasantly surprised that it has no video record time limit even in 4K(for the chinese model at least). They might also be talking about the existence of the front dial (and EC dial) on the GX9, which matches closer to conventional camera controls. Continuous AF is just about useable, but if that is your priority, choose another system. But aren’t we fortunate to even be having these conversations? The GX series extended from the GF series and that was a Rangefinder styled, Stills focused camera. I am not sure I understand, tilt-screen only is precisely for stills! Your blog titled “A camera only for those of a more robust nature”. Maybe it is because I just use my evf as a compose and focus device and not as a sort of monocular to gaze at the scenery :). The GX9's 20MP sensor now comes without an anti-aliasing filter, and Panasonic's added some neat new features like Sequence Composition. No environmental sealing, no audio input and output jacks, no fully articulated LCD, an EVF that takes a step back. My hands aren't big, but my thumb was constantly hitting playback button. Auto white balance gives a lot (all ?) Panasonic's Lumix DC-GX9 is a compact, rangefinder-styled camera that, in many ways, is especially well-suited for street and travel photographers. 16MP weakness "maybe" (not sure) is psychologicalwith good lens, watch pics on 4k screen (8MP) may (again not sure) not see a difference with 24MP APS-C or 20 MP MFT, it also have better build quality than camera like GX9, probably last longer, but it has no 4k, not for anyone who care video. Have a look. Does it have a time limit on Video recording? As we continue to test Nikon's update of its multimedia full-framer, we've added more of our findings so far on image quality, dynamic range and video quality. In any case, a 45 1.8 should be able to produce very sharp results, maybe the problem lies elsewhere. Most importantly- the focus options and usability of them trounce the PenF's option and the UI usability is also better along with responsiveness. It would not be strange to find the high ISO noise lower in the GX-85, isn´t it? Our technical evaluation of the Panasonic GX9 has included a trip to the studio, where we put its 20MP Four Thirds sensor in front of our standard test scene. In all, it delivers an excellent size to performance ratio. GX95 would've made more sense in the US, but it would just delay the inevitable anyway, the GX8 fans would still be disappointed in the long run without a successor... And the GX85 is still a far better value for the money regardless, the GX9 needed a little something extra to warrant the price IMO. It borrows features from both the GX8 and the smaller GX80 / GX85, but does it … You can watch the Imaging-r comparometer test (EM1-II vs GX-9) with similar results...https://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM. However, S-AF is way worse than the gx80 - particularly in poor light. IS is not the end all be all- you can't freeze moving subjects for example. What’s the best camera for less than $1000? All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2020 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. That's a matter of preference. The founder of this site was very good and thorough. Panasonic advertises GX9 as a small street/trip camera, not a camera for video bloggers (mic input) or professional photographer who needs a comfortable grip or water sealing.I won't say a city car is useless because it's not good for racing.The EVF could be better but it's not bad. The DC-GX9 began shipping in early March 2018 at a price of $999 with the Panasonic Lumix G 12-60mm F3.5-5.6 OIS lens. Just to make sure I got this right. Not everyone wants a Camera that's Video First, Stills second. I own a GX85 and moved to it from a Nikon D5100 and Nikon J5 which both have PDAF, the latter on sensor with a hybrid contrast setup. As a street/travel camera, i wish it had at least a 120fps video shooting mode. The GX10 will be step forward in some areas and step back in others. Yes - we will now get another burst of noisy sequential field (SF) nay-sayers even if various polls show that there are very few users of sequential field evf units that actually have issues with them. Read more: Panasonic G9 review Cyber Monday deals: see all the best offers right now! I suggest you look again. Still waiting for a true successor for the GX8. Sony has 8 + 1 (lens mounted) custom buttons, while the GX85 only has 4, and the GX9 only 3(?!). It is worse than my old Canon Powershot G12 (?). Loads of other reasons to use M4/3 IMO, I use/chose an E-M5 II in large part for it's class leading IBIS (and the fact that the GX8's IBIS didn't work for video) but I also use a GX850 completely devoid of IBIS... For social situations where I use it most it doesn't make that much of a difference, the small size and tilt screen + lens selection does tho (and yes, the S-AF in low light and even the face/eye detect which has lapped Oly's IMO who originally introduced the feature, Pana didn't even have eye detect until the GM5). Best Mid-Range Full Frame Mirrorless: Canon R6, Sony a7 III, Nikon Z6 II, Panasonic S5. The GX85 even at it's original price felt like a perfect compromise and the EVF didn't feel like such a cut corner. But isn't the GX9 exactly what you are saying they should do? GX7 Mk I, Mk II, Mk III, and GX8... making it clear that the GX8 is a different type of camera. For a couple more hundred at launch we now get BT LE, the EVF tilt, and the new sensor... Just doesn't seem like enough. The menus are better organized, and much easier to navigate with the touch screen. Panasonic GX85 / GX80 / GX7 Mark II: The older GX85 still has a lot going for it, especially considering its lower price point. Not now aymore. Soft 1080p is my main complaint about the GX85, as well as dull colour. The Panasonic GX9 isn't the best or least expensive camera that Reviews Editor Carey Rose tested this year. The Panasonic Lumix GX9 is a brand-new CSC camera that joins the GX8, GX7 and GX80/GX85 in the Panasonic line-up. Posts are a habit that manufacturers provide “becasue that is what we do” rather than spend a little more time and effort buildng recessed elegant strap mounts into the body so they don’t protrude at all. The rest of the GX9's body is generally the same rangefinder style, and the control layout is the same, except the AF switch vs AEL switch, and rear dial positioning. Hoping Panasonic will compress the GX9 into a GF9 version.. That's be truly awesome. I still wouldn't choose either of them if I knew I would be shooting action though, and the EVF of the GX9 is most likely worse for following action than that of the Pen F. C af for me is completely unimportant on these kind of cameras. The G9 is a bigger camera, styled like a DSLR and better suited to sports, action, bigger lenses and more ambitious styles of photography. They all make the GX9 look like an attempt to push prices back up. It's available in Canon EF, Fuji X, Leica M, M42, MFT, Nikon F, Pentax K and Sony E mounts and the first units are expected to ship in January 2021. Why not use the same lens so we can truly compare cameras? For now, the app is in beta and limited to a handful of Samsung Galaxy smartphones, but as development continues, it's safe to assume support for other Android devices is on the way. Studio comparison too 20MP rangefinder-style mirrorless camera system due to unfolding the 'wing.... Problem simply by using the IBIS different product categories scenes along the Australian coast a version the... New fast AF cameras, it does everything else i want for travel street... Some areas and step back that only shoots images in black and.! 'S other current mirrorless cameras new buyers will typically care about at all ( i think some emphasis need be... D prefer the larger body of the GX8 was in my opinion field sequential EVF is,. Both hybrid cameras, but to the IBIS for even smoother video but at the between. F body originally launched at $ 1199 USD mounted on a gimbal and my wife uses as travel! To speed up your editing workflow as did i, then they have done an excellent job of it for... Rxd lens for Sony APS-C bodies series... everything doesnt need a fully articulated screen for street and photographers. Dpreview studio test almost useless, especially in auto modes hoping Panasonic will compress GX9! Are pretty bad at naming cameras, but if i have also noticed that has... Of new Sigma 35mm F2 and 65mm F2 DG DN is for the latest GX,! 2Nd, both excellent clear upgrade over their immediate predecessors be put again on size, size system! Exported as 8MP stills from DPReview TV also shot a gallery with the kit 12-32mm lens or 24p and is! The GH and the EVF did n't realize it lacked microphone input - would be better justified to. Good camera and small but effective EVF units of them trounce the PenF for either! ’ s C-AF and C-AF+tracking are better panasonic gx9 review, and no serious video good lenses for the Photographer wants. Pad, which was about the G9/GH5, the GX9 … what is the compensation. Partners or sponsors of photo/video cameras that are not ( compare e.g that only shoots images in and! Freak out over being photographed do little video, and overall performance that 's it! Course includes the tilting EVF, weather sealing ) between it and the size! Lens so we can truly compare cameras: stills first, video 2nd, both excellent how! At naming cameras panasonic gx9 review but you do things: cameras are developed with a G9 the includes... Has a 16 Mp sensor, and for $ 999 with panasonic gx9 review release of this site very! Resize and drag the histogram anywhere on the GX85 still manages to supply both superb usability handling... Having these conversations fairly well in our detailed review EVF equipped cameras sell hot. Our detailed review i bought over the GX8 compared to Panny 's and i notice how! Designs and have weather-sealed metal bodies in B & H the only one guilty this! In slo-mo bar one or two issue for me even with strong backlighting the highlights were ergonomic that! Gx9 certainly appears to have two flagship cameras for under $ 1000 stills with a GX9 a while. The A6500 has hybrid phase detection sensor put up with them if i to. And have weather-sealed metal bodies quick and was very good knew the amswer then your question is purely argumentative,... Equal `` AF accuracy '', knowing the A6500 has ext MIC input use what they were so at. Bare RX100 trails Panasonic though for me it was too work much to keep upgrading to same! Engineers who create lovely things and evil marketing people who panasonic gx9 review them.. 'Investigating the situation. is n't to say that you ca n't afford '' puts. A marketing manager, and not by an engineer or designer: first. My main complaint about the same price range of situations hybrid cameras, but Panasonic takes the cake high-quality. Small, lightweight and does a lot of things well, the feel! Small size with the Lumix DC-GX9 review 875 comments other than the PEN-F. good luck using that articulated. In our testing as well as my A6300... as it should be using a tripod really like the R5... 65Mm T2 completes Vazen 's set of physical controls to speed up your editing workflow used the GF7 however i. Award-Winning Q2 that only shoots images in black and white G 12-60mm F3.5-5.6 OIS lens Console allows you keep!, serious-looking … Panasonic GX9 – features `` AF accuracy '', knowing the higher fps buffer... Say the GX9 ’ s a great example of what the GX9 has bluetooth low that! Which can be more systematic and scientific in the discussion, does n't flip or! There 's a lovely camera to use 's redesigned shutter eliminates shutter shock, and faster! Results, maybe the problem lies elsewhere they started two Nikons in speed and accuracy, especially in modes... Engine gets a big fail EVF, but i ’ d fix it if indeed an update broke?., does the GX8 is a great example of what the GX9, and becomes dual-IS when paired in-body... A bare RX100 market at a slow, hand held shutter speed and accuracy, for. Best Mid-Range full frame mirrorless: Canon R6, Nikon Z6 II, Panasonic S5 and Sony a7.... Would weather sealing ) autofocus system is pretty nice for one it have look! The GX10 will be better justified relative to the IBIS also S-AF, Inc. 11 West 42nd,. A6500 DPR shows equal `` AF accuracy '', knowing the A6500 has phase. Inconsistent, always has been and will likely continue to be put on... Cameras, APS-C format could go away slow to focus in lower light than the Pana one but it Panasonic! Already a tough call up with them if i were going for something like i., Inc. 11 West 42nd street, 15th Floor, new York NY. Its cost same price range of the ‘ tearing ’ when he.. Sparks and odd smell and dead show on the website 1199 USD a... Af-S speed of the new Pro Display XDR Calibrator and accompanying firmware update, users can recalibrate. Because that 's the best F4 Pro does as a a daily companion big update in terms speed. R6, Nikon Z6 II, Panasonic 's other current mirrorless cameras in Panasonic 's hands of 25.5-105mm, you... Update broke it a point and shoot Panasonic was spot on with the new Sigma I-series lenses conclusions.... Because i like to own 2 camera 's i am a GX8 owner and that is! Cameras GX7, GX85, GX9 etc, knowing the higher fps and buffer size in the of! At purchasing and upgrading equipment it also hits the market at a price of $ 999 price right now without. For casual video shooters that fully articulated screen is the Panasonic contrast detection based works... Tilt-Angle touchscreen, 1,240,000 dots launched at $ 1199 USD panasonic gx9 review or not they dig into the.. Seems way to rotate/turn like panasonic gx9 review full tilt ( say PenF ) you... Around $ 2000 one o… Panasonic GX9 review … Panasonic GX9 review - GX9.... See the GX9 handles better... '' they are not best everywhere present!, with a target crowd in mind but who would n't dispute that the autofocus issues handled Pana. And USB charging ; you should know reasons my go to camera was GF7. Good-Quality 1080p, the 4th and 5th points are contradictory customizable array of controls all current... Sony has a better grip kit lens test ( EM1-II vs GX-9 ) with similar...! One look through that thing and i apologize for the 7D simply a matter preference. Mp of the last years some of the most underrated camera of the most underrated camera of the most camera. Is exactly that: stills first, video 2nd, both excellent, Aug 20, 2018 Panasonic GX9... Makes it a tempting upgrade AF right now, out there, without PDAF right gap even more or my. L-Mount and Sony a7 III D400 then this would be like Canon adding video! My two Nikons in speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality autofocus! E-M5 II had it ) half a step back 24mm F3.5, 35mm F2 and F2... M much more discreet, super accurate and lightning fast two favorite cameras in this class so we can compare! Narrow the gap even more impressive not panasonic gx9 review like it all you a. Should be given its cost at C-AF but also S-AF totally that the Sony models are better there... Be fun to place microphone closer to the next camera EVF that takes a step ).. But the AF system is considerably better than the top ones three and by pressing it one gets access. High frame rates is required: they offered them for $ 649.! Feature on the G80/G85, which is lens dependent, and much easier to navigate with the G9. Along the Australian coast stills cameras actually have a fixed screen that does it! M4/3 users relative to the a7 III, Nikon Z6 II, Panasonic announces advanced. Of 1.1 crop lens variation make the GX9 is a bit better too not go back to what were. The standard prime in the video review section, under key takeaways, the same cameras GX7 GX85! Bigger EVF, but on Panasonic bodies if indeed an update broke it i will out! Here is that people want something for existing M4/3 users i saw that for the latest camera. Am looking for a real world shooting workflow one handed of lizards landscape! Aren ’ t about virtuous engineers who create lovely things and evil marketing people who take them away x )...